reflection blog 1
Wednesday, August 6, 2014
week 6
Reading chapter 16, was kind of like a little refresher course for me. Working in mostly skilled nursing facilities I have had a chance to care for people from all walks of life. In my opinion caring for hospice patients is the most rewarding and I actually enjoy it. People often ask me how I could possibly enjoy caring for those that are dying. I have had a few people close to me pass away, I know exactly how I would want them cared for in the same situation. I feel that anyone that is on their "death bed" deserves the best care possible. As sad as it can be being by someone's side and seeing their loved ones in pain I am glad to do anything I can to help. I find it interesting how differently people deal with death, whether it be a loved one or themselves. I have seen people with no emotion whatsoever and I have seen people become rude and hostile with everyone in their path. Everyone has their own grieving process. This chapter reminded me that anything can happen to anyone at any given moment and loved ones need to be cherished.
Friday, August 1, 2014
week 5
This weeks article "As Good as it Gets" was interesting, comparing the Netherlands with the US and talking about major differences involving taxes, benefits, retirement, and health care. It was looking at different ways of doing things.
I believe that Americans are greedy. I think that everyone wants a piece of the pie and are always thinking about how they can improve THEMSELVES, THEIR homes, and THEIR families. It doesn’t make them bad people but that’s just how our country works, it is how we are influenced. Americans don’t want the government to tax us and take money out of our checks to go towards taking care of other people. It seems wrong to take their hard earned money away from them. Welfare for example is state money given to assist people. Lots of people disagree with this concept it seems absurd to them welfare recipients are not drug tested while the American tax payer is drug tested in order to work and earn money, that is later taken out of their pay check. There are also people in America that would like to be more like the Netherlands and have high taxes so that when they retire or they are hurt they don’t have to pay so much money for healthcare. Me being one of them. People with access to affordable healthcare will actually use it. Over the years I have opted out of insurance for the simple fact it is too expensive. I refuse to be seen unless I am positive something is wrong with me. It is very common for people to neglect signs and symptoms of illness in fear of debt, oftentimes diseases or sickness is ignored too long and becomes severe and even fatal in many cases.
With having said that the article also informs us of how the different countries look at responsiveness. In the US people want something in return immediately. People like to SEE change quickly, they want results. Everything is high paced and high stressed with the hustle and bustle of life you need immediate care it has become what is expected.
I believe that Americans are greedy. I think that everyone wants a piece of the pie and are always thinking about how they can improve THEMSELVES, THEIR homes, and THEIR families. It doesn’t make them bad people but that’s just how our country works, it is how we are influenced. Americans don’t want the government to tax us and take money out of our checks to go towards taking care of other people. It seems wrong to take their hard earned money away from them. Welfare for example is state money given to assist people. Lots of people disagree with this concept it seems absurd to them welfare recipients are not drug tested while the American tax payer is drug tested in order to work and earn money, that is later taken out of their pay check. There are also people in America that would like to be more like the Netherlands and have high taxes so that when they retire or they are hurt they don’t have to pay so much money for healthcare. Me being one of them. People with access to affordable healthcare will actually use it. Over the years I have opted out of insurance for the simple fact it is too expensive. I refuse to be seen unless I am positive something is wrong with me. It is very common for people to neglect signs and symptoms of illness in fear of debt, oftentimes diseases or sickness is ignored too long and becomes severe and even fatal in many cases.
With having said that the article also informs us of how the different countries look at responsiveness. In the US people want something in return immediately. People like to SEE change quickly, they want results. Everything is high paced and high stressed with the hustle and bustle of life you need immediate care it has become what is expected.
Thursday, July 17, 2014
After watching the “Tough Guise” video I realized just how much masculinity and the “tough guy” appearance is pushed on boys and men of all ages. I have a teenage son and all around him are images, advertisements, and everyday situations that are encouraging him to strive to be tough, strong, and manly. I have no problem with my son being into hunting, fishing, and sports, I want him to be an athletic hard working man when he grows up but like with everything there has to be a balance.
To me what sets apart “the bad guys” and the “good guys” is respect. Respect for themselves, respect for women, respect for your elders, ect. The problem is that most young men start out with lots of respect then see in the media or in a lot of music the blatant disrespect for women. A good man is going to love, care for, and respect a woman. He’s not going to be out “pimpin his hoes” or “getting money” but these are the type of images that the media is sending to children. And of course you can’t control every move your kid makes so you have to hope that you did your job raising them to respect others and to stay true to themselves. Unfortunately a lot of parents just assume that their kids are making the right choices when in reality their brains are absorbing this masculinity and naturally put on this “tough guy” front as a surviving mechanism just like what was said in the video. Ultimately to survive we have to find a mate and reproduce and men are getting it in their heads the more masculine and violent they are the more attractive they are and this is where we have to start educating and encourage them that violence is not only unattractive but can get them into a lot of trouble.
To conclude I think the best way to break the cycle of violence and this “tough guy” image is to educate our kids when they are young and to have the confidence knowing that even if my son is watching these violent images on TV or hearing about them in a song it doesn’t mean he is going to be an aggressive, violent person because he knows better. It’s important for me to know that when he grows up he will instill the same characteristics into his son. It’s really just a matter of everyone addressing the issue because let’s be honest there’s nothing we can do to change media it’s been the same for years and it will continue to be the way it is.
week 3
After watching the “Tough Guise” video I realized just how much masculinity and the “tough guy” appearance is pushed on boys and men of all ages. I have a teenage son and all around him are images, advertisements, and everyday situations that are encouraging him to strive to be tough, strong, and manly. I have no problem with my son being into hunting, fishing, and sports, I want him to be an athletic hard working man when he grows up but like with everything there has to be a balance.
To me what sets apart “the bad guys” and the “good guys” is respect. Respect for themselves, respect for women, respect for your elders, ect. The problem is that most young men start out with lots of respect then see in the media or in a lot of music the blatant disrespect for women. A good man is going to love, care for, and respect a woman. He’s not going to be out “pimpin his hoes” or “getting money” but these are the type of images that the media is sending to children. And of course you can’t control every move your kid makes so you have to hope that you did your job raising them to respect others and to stay true to themselves. Unfortunately a lot of parents just assume that their kids are making the right choices when in reality their brains are absorbing this masculinity and naturally put on this “tough guy” front as a surviving mechanism just like what was said in the video. Ultimately to survive we have to find a mate and reproduce and men are getting it in their heads the more masculine and violent they are the more attractive they are and this is where we have to start educating and encourage them that violence is not only unattractive but can get them into a lot of trouble.
To conclude I think the best way to break the cycle of violence and this “tough guy” image is to educate our kids when they are young and to have the confidence knowing that even if my son is watching these violent images on TV or hearing about them in a song it doesn’t mean he is going to be an aggressive, violent person because he knows better. It’s important for me to know that when he grows up he will instill the same characteristics into his son. It’s really just a matter of everyone addressing the issue because let’s be honest there’s nothing we can do to change media it’s been the same for years and it will continue to be the way it is.
Thursday, July 10, 2014
week 1
While reading the article identity dance one page stood out to me the most. In bold letters it reads "Genetics couldn't explain why some people bounce back from terrible trauma that shatters others, or why some people are ruthlessly ambitious and others laid back." I was drawn to theses words because I have been wondering the same thing for quite some time. Someone very close to me suffered a traumatic childhood filled with physical and mental abuse. I find it interesting that siblings that grew up in the same family sharing equally traumatic experiences can have such different outcomes. It seems they all are still affected by thier past but a few more severely than others. Sharing the same genes one would think all involved would be genetically and mentally equipped to handle situations similarly, but unfortunately that is not the case.
Everyone is set up a specific way genetically to react and deal with life's ups and downs? This is one thing I would like to learn more about while taking this course. According to this article people that have a the short transporter gene are more likely to become depressed after experiencing a series of stressful events. Statistics have proven fourty-three percent of people who carried the short gene who experienced four or more tumultuous events became clinically depressed. Those with the short gene that did not have stressful events became depressed at the average rate of the general population. While those with the long gene that were subject to four or more traumatic events have a seventeen percent chance of depression. One theory says that genes have "switches" that can be turned on and of like a light switch. If that is the case, then wouldn't the number of people with depression be dwindling?
Everyone is set up a specific way genetically to react and deal with life's ups and downs? This is one thing I would like to learn more about while taking this course. According to this article people that have a the short transporter gene are more likely to become depressed after experiencing a series of stressful events. Statistics have proven fourty-three percent of people who carried the short gene who experienced four or more tumultuous events became clinically depressed. Those with the short gene that did not have stressful events became depressed at the average rate of the general population. While those with the long gene that were subject to four or more traumatic events have a seventeen percent chance of depression. One theory says that genes have "switches" that can be turned on and of like a light switch. If that is the case, then wouldn't the number of people with depression be dwindling?
week 2
While reading the article " What's the difference between boys and girls?" I instantly thought of my teenage son. Though I didn't allow him to play with toy guns until he was four of five, he automatically knew what to do with them and always followed the rules. Now that he is older he is the same boy with a collection of BB guns and a thirst for hunting and fishing competitively. my son being the competitive child he is, I learned could be from higher levels of testosterone. Which also explains the way he is when it comes to playing sports, in your face ruthless and out for a win at any cost. My daughter on the other hand, does enjoy playing with BB guns but loves her stuffed huskies. My daughter being a tom-boy wears nothing but basketball shorts and hoodies and loves to get dirty. I wonder if maybe she has higher levels of testosterone caused by the adrenal gland? "Both the Berkeley study and a more recent federal daycare study find a different pattern in girls; they're emotionally sturdier". I find that to be true. I find my daughter to be less sensitive than my son though he tries to not show it. I learned that they're healthy development seems most harmed by being restricted and its confinement that brings down IQ in girls.
Something that piqued my curiosity while reading this article, is what about the testosterone levels in homosexuals? If a gay/ Trans-gender men prefer to dress as a woman, does that mean they have lower testosterone than the average male or the "pink gene" as quoted by a British journalist. Same goes for lesbians, do they have more testosterone than the average woman or do the majority suffer from congenital adrenal hyperplasia? If I had unlimited funds to do more research, I would like to research more on this particular topic.
Monday, June 9, 2014
Week 9
This weeks article "As Good as it Gets" was interesting, comparing
the Netherlands with the US and talking about major differences involving
taxes, benefits, retirement, and health care. It was looking at
different ways of doing things.
I believe that Americans are greedy.
I think that everyone wants a piece of the pie and are always thinking about
how they can improve THEMSELVES, THEIR homes, and THEIR families. It doesn’t
make them bad people but that’s just how our country works, it is how we are
influenced. Americans don’t want the government to tax us and take money out of
our checks to go towards taking care of other people. It seems wrong to take
their hard earned money away from them. Welfare for example is state money
given to assist people. Lots of people disagree with this concept it seems
absurd to them welfare recipients are not drug tested while the American tax
payer is drug tested in order to work and earn money, that is later taken out
of their pay check. There are also people in America that would like to be more
like the Netherlands and have high taxes so that when they retire or they are
hurt they don’t have to pay so much money for heathcare. Me being one of them. With having said that the article
also informs us of how the different countries look at responsiveness. In the
US people want something in return immediately. People like to SEE change
quickly, they want results. Everything is high paced and high stressed with the
hussle and bussle of life you need immediate care it has become what is
expected.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)